Workplace Privacy: What
Every Employers Should Know
Lisa J. Sotto and Elisabeth M. McCarthy*
Employers must juggle a panoply of privacy
issues when it comes to the employee relationship. Beginning with pre-employment background screening through the
disposal of employee personal information, employers confront a multitude of
privacy issues. The widespread use of
technology in the workplace and the ease and speed with which information now
flows has only served to further confound employers. In the U.S., there is no omnibus employee privacy law. Instead, employers are faced with a
patchwork of privacy laws that are varied and complex. This article focuses on two employer privacy
issues: background screening and the disposal of consumer report information.
According to a January 2004 survey by the
Society for Human Resource Management, 82% of employers investigate potential
employees’ backgrounds. Employers
conduct background checks not only to verify applicants’ credentials but also
to ensure workplace safety and avoid potentially devastating financial and
reputational harms associated with negligent hiring, retention and supervision
claims. Employers typically ask
“consumer reporting agencies” or CRA’s to assemble and evaluate information
about a job applicant’s professional and personal life. Certain jobs, such as those in the banking,
child care, health care, airline and trucking industries, require criminal
background checks.
The
Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) was enacted to promote the accuracy, fairness
and privacy of personal information assembled by consumer reporting agencies
(CRAs). The FCRA allows CRAs to furnish
an entity with consumer reports only where the recipient has a permissible
purpose to use the reports. Permissible
purposes include use for employment purposes or use in connection with credit
or insurance transactions. The FCRA
defines a “consumer report” as “any written, oral or other communication of any
information by a consumer reporting agency bearing on a consumer’s credit
worthiness, credit standing, credit capacity, character, general reputation,
personal characteristics or mode of living, which is used or collected in whole
or in part for . . . employment purposes.”
Many
sources of information used in background checks are public records, including
criminal, civil court, bankruptcy, tax lien, professional licensing, workers’
compensation and driving records. The
FCRA imposes restrictions on the inclusion of certain public records in
background screening reports. For
example, for positions with an annual salary of less than $75,000, civil
judgments and paid tax liens cannot be reported in a background screening
report after seven years, and bankruptcy filings cannot be reported after ten
years. In addition, records relating to
an individual’s arrest cannot be included in a background check report after
seven years. A criminal conviction may
be reported indefinitely.
An
employee background check may also include an employment report for a job
applicant from one or all three of the credit reporting agencies (Equifax,
Experian and TransUnion). An employment
report contains information regarding an individual’s credit payment history
and other credit habits, but does not include the individual’s credit score or
date of birth.
In
addition, employers may seek to obtain education records. This type of information may include dates
of attendance at educational institutions and degrees earned. Employers seeking information from education
records, however, may be restricted in gaining access to certain records
without authorization from an adult-age student or parent due to restrictions
set forth in the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act.
The
FCRA requires employers to certify to the CRAs that the employer (i) is
requesting the report for a legitimate purpose (i.e., investigation of a
job applicant or existing employee), (ii) provided the subject individual with
the requisite notice of the background check, (iii) has obtained written
permission from the subject individual to request the background report, (iv)
will provide the subject individual with a copy of the report and written
notice of his or her rights prior to taking an adverse action based in whole or
in part on information contained in the background report, and (v) will use the
background report only for employment purposes.
The
Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (“FACTA”) amended the FCRA to
establish standards for “employee misconduct investigations.” An “employee misconduct investigation” is an
employee investigation conducted by a third party that the employer hires if
the employer suspects workplace misconduct or non-compliance with federal,
state or local laws or regulations, pre-existing written policies of the
employer, or rules of a self-regulatory organization. Under FACTA, an employer need not obtain an employee’s consent
prior to hiring a third party to investigate suspected employee
misconduct. If the employer decides to
take an adverse action against the employee subject to such an investigation,
however, the employer must give the employee an “adverse action” notice after
the adverse action has occurred.
In
2004, the FTC issued regulations requiring businesses to properly dispose of
consumer report information. The rule,
which became effective on June 1, 2005, was designed to help combat identity
theft resulting from the improper disposal of information. The Disposal Rule requires companies to take
reasonable steps to guard against unauthorized access to or use of consumer
report information in connection with its disposal. It applies to any business that maintains or otherwise possesses
“consumer information,” which is defined as “any record about an individual,
whether in paper, electronic, or other form, that is a consumer report or is
derived from a consumer report . . . [or] a compilation of such records.” Because employers frequently rely on
consumer reports in connection with employment decisions, employers are affected
by the Disposal Rule.
Conclusion
Although there is no
overarching U.S. employee privacy law, myriad privacy requirements apply to
employers. Employers should exercise
caution in collecting, using, disclosing and disposing of employee personal
information and should seek to understand all the legal mandates that impact
the use of such information.
*Ms. Sotto is a partner in the New York office of Hunton & Williams
LLP and heads the firm’s Privacy and Information Management Practice. She also serves as Acting Chair of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Data
Privacy and Integrity Advisory Committee.
Ms. McCarthy is counsel in the New York office of Hunton & Williams
LLP and advises clients on privacy and information management issues.