The US Supreme Court set down a clearer set
of guidelines about sexual harassment, bringing federal laws closer to
California laws.
The New Rules (as reported in the Orange County Register, June 27,
1998):
Hostile Work Environment refers to harassment by supervisors, managers,
coworkers, agents of the company/organization and outside vendors. Hostile
Work Environment consists of a condition where employee cannot do their job
without feeling harassed or threatened. (1)
According to most legal definitions, Hostile
Work Environment refers to harassment or discrimination that is a violation
of a person's civil rights - based on gender, sexual orientation, race, color,
nationality, ancestry, ethnic origin, religion, physical handicap/disability,
medical condition, physical appearance, marital status, veteran status,
education.
Webster's definition of Hostile (2):
Webster's definition of Hostility:
Recent news reports quote research that
people who witness harassment have stress symptoms almost as severe as
those who are the target of harassment.
Consensual Behavior consists of voluntary, mutually welcome
relationships between coworkers at any level. Consensual behavior is not
regulated by laws nor do laws try to interfere in the personal private lives of
coworkers. However, be aware, other employees may feel discriminated against,
harassed or work in a hostile environment if denied equal opportunity
due to a consensual relationship of coworkers. (1)
A Hostile Workplace is one where
people can not do their best work or be their most productive due to conditions
in their workplace. That is, the workplace is hostile to their natural
humanity. Notice also the results of a hostile workplace are hostility
toward the company's productivity, which directly impact profits in a negative
way. People who are unhappy, unhealthy or angry do not work hard.
Hostile workplace is the result of
suppression of people's natural ability to express themselves. It is the
opposite of a workplace that promotes creativity and vitality. Hostile
workplaces are deadly to productivity. They are unhealthy - and
potentially deadly - to the people who work in them.
Hostility consists of:
According to Dr. Suzette Elgin, hostility
can make you sick or kill you! Dr. Elgin also says (3):
· Hostile language can kill you
as surely as hostile driving can . . . Hostile language hurts and frustrates
and confuses people . . . the damage takes place slowly, over time, and the
wouldn't aren't readily visible. . . .
· Exposure to chronic verbal
abuse doesn't leave you with obvious cuts and bruises, but is a guaranteed
recipe for ulcers, migraine headaches, high blood pressure, allergy attacks;
accidents in the home and in the workplace and on the highway, colds, rashes,
rashes, depression and every sort of misery.
· Angry, cynical people are five
times as likely to die under 50 as people who are calm and trusting (New
York Times, January 17, 1989)
· Scientists have long noted an
association between social relationships and health. More socially isolated or
less socially integrated people are less healthy, psychologically and
physically, and more likely to die. Science, June 19, 1988)
· These effects don't show up on
the short term, which is why it took so long to find out what was really
happening. In the short term, it often looks as if the meanest, angriest,
least-liked people are the ones getting the benefits. It took today's
computers, which can find the patterns in the data from hundreds of thousands
of health histories extending over lifetimes, to show us what the real facts
are. They're not the facts you see on television.
· People who are too angry to
listen cannot be educated.
· Research has shown that
attentive listening is actually good for your health. When you are really
listening, your blood pressure goes down, your heartbeat moderates and your
body shows the healthful changes associated with relaxation.
· When your language behavior
makes other people enjoy being around you and look forward to talking with you,
when you clean up your language environment so that verbal violence isn't a
routine part of your life, you do more for your health and well-being than you
could ever accomplish in any other way.
· If for no other reason, and
no matter what your gender, that's why you should bother.
Sources:
(1) Zero Tolerance:
Sexual Harassment Prevention, a training program, by Barbara Taylor,
Michael Anthony, Victor Thies © 1993
(2) Webster's Ninth New
Collegiate Dictionary © 1983
(3) Genderspeak: Men,
Woman and the Gentle Art of Verbal Self-Defense by Suzette Haden Elgin,
Ph.D. © 1993
Profanity is used as either a lazy person's
tool for profound expression or as a shock device. If your workplace is riddled
with swearing, start a collection box where each person who swears or is
otherwise profane voluntarily puts in a dollar towards some charitable cause.
When the contribution dwindles because there is less swearing, use the
contribution box to work on some other behavior, like being grumpy. Aristotle
said that to BE virtuous one need only practice virtue. PRACTICE!
People need to learn that there are many
things they should NEVER do or say at work - things that would be
acceptable in their private life. At a cocktail party or wedding, you can walk
away from an obnoxious guest. You can not do that at work when the obnoxious
person is your boss, coworker or the whole company.
Training teaches people to allow everyone on
the team to enjoy the right to a neutral environment. In turn the company is
more profitable and everyone is the better for it.
This should go without saying. However, all
too often, employees bring or keep such materials at work or call it up on the
Internet. The workplace is no place for this material. PERIOD!
Dirty jokes are the cheapest laugh. Any
comedian will tell you that. If you really want to be funny, do it without sex
or profanity. Compare Jerry Seinfeld to Andrew Dice Clay and ask yourself which
type of workplace (Seinfeld or Clay) would your people be more comfortable in.
Just because it is not disgusting or sexist
doesn't mean that it can't be funny.
This is a very difficult but important
issue. In a recent seminar which I gave on sexual harassment, this issue became
very focused on whether people could 'hug' at work. The discussion turned to
what people wanted to communicate by hugging — support, congratulations,
empathy, attraction, warmth etc.
In work, it is this writer's opinion that
the shorthand of the 'hug' or 'touch' should be avoided.
If you have something to say, say it with
words. The message, most probably, will be clearer.
Many people do not want to be touched or
hugged. It is not their job to tell you that. In many ways, this issue is about
power.
People seek to become a part of groups
within groups. This helps us feel special. We create little clubs to get close
to one another beyond a simple one-to-one relationship. One way this is done is
by being part of a group that teases each other about sex and sexual issues.
This is also used as an icebreaker. A really bad icebreaker.
Think back twenty years to this oldie but
not so goody, 'Hey, you're cool, I really want to get high with you.' Same
difference, and just as bad.
Bonding can occur on the job or through
group reading, group mountain climbing, leadership seminars, or intramural
bowling or football or golf leagues instead of through sexual innuendo and
teasing.
Doing this right builds team character and
dignity. Doing this wrong builds lawsuits.
Romance sometimes happens at work. It can
create a hostile environment for coworkers not involved in the relationship,
and also between the romantically-involved employees in the event that the
romance ends (especially if it ends poorly).
Romances between managers and their direct
reports can - in some jurisdictions - create legal exposure for the employer.
The issue of workplace romances should be addressed and discussed, not ignored.
Create policies and stick by them (i.e., a
manager is not allowed to be romantically involved with anyone that he or she
supervises).
"The fish rots from the head"
(1988 Dukakis/Bush presidential race).
Whatever the goal, if top management acts or
believes contrary to the desired action or attitude — the goal is destined for
failure.
You can not create a productive and fun work
environment where the president is onsite and forces busy work upon his staff
and is cruel to boot.
Likewise, you can not create a workplace
striving to be free of sexual harassment where the top managers are insensitive
(pronounced offensive) OAFs.
If you are an OAF, de-OAF yourself - before
a court or administrative agency decides to help you in the process.
First, adopt the policy and make it part of
the culture of the company.
Second, live by it - not because it is the
law, but because it is the right thing to do.
With this attitude - as opposed to one of
begrudging compliance - your workplace, your company's productivity and
the value of your company will be enhanced.
Copyright © 1997 Richard K.
Berger (contact [at] berkent.com). RickyBerger is the founder of Berger Law Office, which
concentrates its practice in representing emerging businesses and employees
with their job-related and pre and post-employment needs. Disclaimer: The above
article should not be considered or relied upon as legal or other advice in any
manner whatsoever.
Source:
http://www.berkent.com/